Sharon Tate Autopsy Baby10/9/2021
Documentaries, books, television series, and movies have all been made about the brutal event, including Quentin Tarantino's latest film, ' Once Upon a Time In Hollywood. 50 years on, the effect of these murders still haunt the nation. One of the victims was the pregnant actress Sharon Tate, the wife of director Roman Polanski.Other members of Mansons family had spoken of how they loved children, and everywhere the band moved, children were part of the entourage. She was 8 1/2 months pregnant. There have also been a few people commenting who knew either Sharon or her family or lived nearby, thereby testifying that the events of were real.Then it was Miss Tates turn. I don’t pay much attention to traffic on this site, but did notice a recent uptick and stumbled on part of the reason, a post entitled “ We Know Sharon Tate Did Not Die, But Was She Even Pregnant?” That post, from April of 2017, has drawn 29,400 views at this time, and has been the cause of quite a few comments (that don’t see light of day) ridiculing me and questioning my sanity. 8, 1969, the stunning Valley of the.
![]() The murders of Leno and Rosemary Labianca on 8/9/69 have never, in my mind anyway, been solved. They knew police would cooperate. The LaBianca murders on the following night might well have been copycat, that is, mobsters, seeing the larger hoax at work, used it to solve some of their own problems. My point is this: real censorship is really effective. Otherwise, skip to the line below.Are you familiar with the work of Mike Bublansky? He has done remarkable research into the WWII battle at Iwo Jima, finding that much if it was fictional.I just made that up! There is no Bublansky. That video has the odor of a rollout to it, a means by which MMG was handed over to a much larger audience than it then had.I’ll briefly explain that idea – if you will humor me. My attention was drawn to Mathis by a video on YouTube, amazingly still there even after the great purge. I thought the question of Sharon Tate’s pregnancy added to that work rather than deriving from it, but let’s be clear: No way would I ever have solved the riddle on my own or known to question it without the MMG paper. There will be no reinventing of the wheel here. There are not many of us, certainly not enough to pose any kind of threat to power. It does no harm, as only people of curious bent will find it. It is all above my pay grade, but a tremendous amount of otherwise hidden information has been released via that site. If people in power intended that we never know of this Bublanski character, his name would never appear anywhere, not on YouTube, not on a search engine, never on a book shelf.In a similar manner, if people in power wanted Miles Mathis censored, we would not know his name and his papers would never see light of day. And while you are studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. That’s not the way the world really works anymore. You believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality. It is as if we are let in on the game and are being rewarded. Many of you who come here also spend time at the Mathis site or Josh’s Cutting through the Fog. It’s a choice we all made. We are watching history’s actors. During the 1960s there was a war in Vietnam, its larger and unstated purpose apparently to move its population into the cities to become part of the labor force that now makes our shirts, socks and underwear. Where does Tate/Manson fit in the larger scheme? It was surely part of Cointelpro and Operation Chaos. He was the chosen vehicle to get that message out, nothing more.)Back to business. (Ron Suskind, by the way, is not a “people like you” type. We cannot stop it or even affect it. It is all far bigger than us. They sent out a cadre of false leaders, people like Noam Chomsky and Howard Zinn on the intellectual front, often seen holding signs. Chomsky (red arrow), “leading” a march on the Pentagon, 1967As with all such currents, leadership was on top of it, monitoring it, and decided it needed to be destroyed. It started on college campuses, and was dignified and clean-cut at the outset. We were the first TV generation, and there was an undercurrent of intelligent activity taking hold, later known as the Antiwar Movement. It appears, from my view, all to be part of major restructuring of the world order, masquerading as war on evildoers.)Meanwhile on the home front the Baby Boomer generation was coming alive. (Prior to that, Japan had been converted to a major manufacturing center, many of its cities razed. LSD was one of the prime movers in destroying young minds. They changed the image of the movement, giving it goofy apparel and saturating it with drugs. The music scene was infiltrated with a host of “stars” from the Intelligence community, David Crosby and Joan Baez still with us, scores of others like Jimi Hendrix and Janis Joplin faking their deaths after their shelf life expired. (My mistakes over time are legion.)I realized, as I looked at the photos seen in the 2017 post, that Sharon was not even pregnant, but was made to appear so. Did it go on to become famous? Did Roman Polanski raise the child in Switzerland? I even thought at one time … just idle speculation … that it became Brad Pitt. After getting up to speed via the MMG work, I often wondered, since I knew Sharon had not died, what became of her baby. The Antiwar movement died on 8/8/69, though no one else was harmed in the making of that movie.Part of the hoax was a gruesome scene in the movie, writers working overtime and having the “Manson Family” remove and kill a live baby from the womb of Sharon Tate. Tate/Manson then destroyed the movement. That really sucked, and he’s a tool.)It was all allowed to flourish, controlled opposition leadership firmly in place. ![]() She was asleep for 10 minutes before I noticed. I once put an insomniac to sleep while talking on the phone. Quite the opposite actually. The bloodier and loud shrieks of terror and begging for mercy the better. My tenant watches nothing but the macabre. Far as society today and what’s on TV nowadays I agree there’s nothing to choose from. In my opinion those shows and movies are for the weak and helpless. I believe TPTB understand the discord caused by slasher betrayal in film either dramatic or comedic and watched due due to boredom and morbid curiosity or just plain having a sick head. There is nothing I can do for them nothing makes any difference. Tenant is also habitual liar and I believe their tastes and behaviors go hand in hand with messed up childhood and getting worked over as an adult. Analogous to Émile Durkheim’s concepts of mechanical and organic solidarity (see functionalism), Bateson posited a symmetrical form of schismogenic behavior that consisted of a competitive relationship between categorical equals (e.g., rivalry) and complementary schismogenesis between categorical unequals (e.g., dominance and submission). Ritual is the narrative device to control said schismogenesis.The concept of schismogenesis was developed by the anthropologist Gregory Bateson in the 1930s, to account for certain forms of social behavior between groups. It’s nice having something to relate to which I find harder each day to encounter.Gregor(y) bateson, the son of the fella that taught us to say ‘genetics’, taught us to say schismogenesis. Again I enjoyed your piece.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorNancy ArchivesCategories |